The Silent Season's End: The Rise of the Bowl Game Opt-Out

Read Time:3 Minute, 52 Second

The 2025 college football season concluded with an unprecedented wave of teams declining postseason bowl invitations. Driven by a volatile combination of College Football Playoff (CFP) heartbreak, mid-season coaching changes, and the unforgiving timeline of the transfer portal, the decision to “take the ball and go home” has moved from a fringe occurrence to a significant trend.

Three bowl-eligible teams, including a perennial powerhouse, opted out, shattering the traditional end-of-season landscape and raising serious questions about the future viability of non-CFP bowl games.

The Three Major Opt-Outs

1. No. 11 Notre Dame Fighting Irish (10-2)

Status: Ranked No. 11 in the final CFP rankings; first team left out of the 12-team field.
The Shock Decision: Following the highly controversial final CFP selection, which saw three-loss Alabama and Miami jump the Irish for the last at-large spots, Notre Dame announced as a team that it was withdrawing its name from all bowl consideration. They were projected to play in the Pop-Tarts Bowl.
The Stated Reason: While officially thanking fans and looking ahead to the 2026 season, the decision was widely viewed as a protest against the CFP committee’s selection process. The team, which won its final 10 games, felt snubbed and prioritized ending the season immediately rather than playing in a “consolation prize” game.

2. Iowa State Cyclones (8-4)

Status: Bowl Eligible (8-4 record).
The Shock Decision: The Cyclones, who had an excellent season, declined a bowl invitation.
The Stated Reason: Iowa State cited significant player health and availability issues. Following the departure of coach Matt Campbell for Penn State, the team announced that an overwhelming number of injuries sustained during the season left them without sufficient healthy players to safely conduct bowl practices and play the game.
The Penalty: Iowa State and Kansas State were each fined $500,000 by the Big 12 Conference for failing to meet contractual obligations to bowl partners.

3. Kansas State Wildcats (6-6)

Status: Bowl Eligible (6-6 record).
The Shock Decision: Kansas State, following the retirement of long-time Head Coach Chris Klieman, also declined an invitation.
The Stated Reason: Athletic Director Gene Taylor said the decision was due to the ongoing coaching staff transition and “several uncertainties regarding player availability.” The new staff prioritized getting a head start on roster evaluation and the transfer portal, judging that fielding a team that was not fully competitive was not in the university’s best interest.
The Penalty: Like Iowa State, the Wildcats were fined $500,000 by the Big 12.

The Domino Effect: 5-7 Teams Also Declining

The ripple effect of these opt-outs was compounded by a growing list of teams with a 5-7 record (who would have been eligible for a bowl due to a shortage of 6-6 teams) also declining invitations, per college football insider Brett McMurphy. At least seven teams, including Florida State, Auburn, UCF, Baylor, Rutgers, Temple, and Kansas, reportedly turned down waiver offers.

The common reasons cited by these programs were:

Transfer Portal Exodus: Players, particularly those with NFL aspirations or those seeking a new school, use the open portal window to exit the program, leaving teams unable to field a representative roster.
Coaching Instability: The lack of a permanent, functioning coaching staff makes bowl prep logistically impossible and strategically unsound.
Low Upside: For a 5-7 team, the minimal financial gain and exposure of a low-tier bowl often don’t outweigh the costs of travel, liability, and the risk of injury to key returning players.

The New Bowl Game Reality

The decisions by Notre Dame, Iowa State, and Kansas State mark a watershed moment, illustrating how the dynamics of college football have fundamentally changed the value proposition of a non-playoff bowl game:

Playoff or Bust: For high-profile programs, missing the 12-team CFP now translates into an immediate end to the season, as a smaller bowl is not seen as a worthy reward for a 10-win season.
Player Empowerment: Players are increasingly prioritizing their health and immediate career prospects (NFL Draft or transfer portal) over participating in an exhibition game, forcing coaches and athletic directors to make difficult decisions.
The Financial Toll: The fines levied by the Big 12 underscore the contractual importance of bowl games to conferences, yet the risk of roster collapse and injury is proving to be a greater deterrent to teams.

The bowl system, once the primary reward and financial engine of the sport’s postseason, now faces an existential crisis as teams openly weigh the benefits of extra practice against the chaos of the college football calendar.